Repositorio Dspace

The different dimensions of livelihood impacts of Payments for Environmental Services (PES) Schemes: A systematic review

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author Blundo Canto, Genowefa Maria
dc.contributor.author Bax, Vincent
dc.contributor.author Quintero, Marcela
dc.contributor.author Cruz García, Gisella Susana
dc.contributor.author Groeneveld, Rolf Adriaan
dc.contributor.author Pérez Marulanda, Lisset
dc.date.accessioned 2019-08-02T03:48:04Z
dc.date.available 2019-08-02T03:48:04Z
dc.date.issued 2018-07
dc.identifier.citation Blundo Canto, G., Bax, V., Quintero, M., Cruz Garcia, G. S., Groeneveld, R. A., & Perez Marulanda, L. (2018). The different dimensions of livelihood impacts of Payments for Environmental Services (PES) schemes: A systematic review. Ecological Economics, 149, 160-183. en_PE
dc.identifier.issn 0921-8009
dc.identifier.uri http://repositorio.uch.edu.pe/handle/uch/298
dc.identifier.uri http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.03.011
dc.identifier.uri https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800917306006
dc.description.abstract Through a systematic review of peer-reviewed and grey literature, this paper analyzes evidence of the livelihood impacts of Payments for Environmental Services (PES). Forty-six studies assessed PES livelihood impacts. The assessments presented more positive livelihood impacts than negative ones, focusing on financial benefits. Non-monetary and non-material impacts of PES were largely understudied. Most reviews focused on ES providers, hindering the understanding of broader societal impacts. The review yielded examples where participants lost from their participation or where improvements in one livelihood dimension paralleled deterioration in another. Consequently, we identified key research gaps in: i) understanding the social and cultural impacts of PES, ii) evaluating environmental and economic additionality from improving other ES at the expense of cultural ones, iii) and assessing PES impacts in terms of trade-offs between multiple livelihood dimensions. Moreover, increased knowledge is needed on the impact of PES on changes in household expenditure and choice, and on trade-offs between household income and inequality in ES provider communities. Finally, if PES schemes are implemented to sustainably improve livelihoods, targeting disaggregated populations, understanding equity and social power relations within and between ES providers and users, and better monitoring and evaluation systems that consider locally relevant livelihood dimensions are needed. en
dc.format application/pdf
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher Elsevier B.V. en_PE
dc.relation info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.relation.isPartOf Ecological Economics
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.source Repositorio Institucional - UCH en_PE
dc.source Universidad de Ciencias y Humanidades en_PE
dc.subject Capacity building en
dc.subject Comparative study en
dc.subject Conservation management en
dc.subject Deforestation en
dc.subject Ecological economics en
dc.subject Ecosystem service en
dc.subject Incentive en
dc.subject Income en
dc.subject Livelihood en
dc.subject Research program en
dc.title The different dimensions of livelihood impacts of Payments for Environmental Services (PES) Schemes: A systematic review en_PE
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.03.011 en_PE
dc.identifier.journal Ecological Economics en_PE
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85044440864


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

REALIZA TU BUSQUEDA


Búsqueda avanzada

Listar

Mi cuenta


© 2021 Repositorio Institucional - Universidad de Ciencias y Humanidades (UCH)