Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12872/360
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorNieto Chaupis, Huber
dc.contributor.authorMatta Solis, Hernán
dc.contributor.authorCampomanes Bravo, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorPerez Siguas, Rosa
dc.contributor.authorCumpen Vidaurre, Roberto
dc.coverage.temporal18 October 2017 through 20 October 2017
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-22T05:09:48Z
dc.date.available2019-08-22T05:09:48Z
dc.date.issued2017-10
dc.identifier.citationNieto-Chaupis, H., Matta-Sólis H., Campomanes-Bravo C., Perez-Siguas R., Cumpen-Vidaurre R. (Octubre, 2017). En Conference on Electrical, Electronics Engineering, Information and Communication Technologies (CHILECON), Chile.en_PE
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.uch.edu.pe/handle/uch/360
dc.identifier.urihttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8229645
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CHILECON.2017.8229645
dc.description.abstractIt's well known that the duration of the engineering programs in Latin American countries like Peru are of order of 5 years, roughly. Commonly, the target of the fifth year of program is to carry out activities of thesis and capstone projects. Clearly these activities would demand that the student can exhibit skills and a certain level of maturity which might be crucial for a successful completion of the projects. However, the expected performance of the students might be correlated to the educational features of the institution (university, technological institute, etc) to some extent. In this manner, in this paper we try to measure the quality of education (QoE) of a Peruvian engineering program through the application of a mathematical methodology based on the individual score of students along the time where the projects take place. Furthermore, the error of the model is interpreted as the possible ambiguities in the evaluations of the progress of the projects, which in some cases the model fails. The present methodology has been applied in a private university in Lima city with data from the 2016, resulting the QoE = 0.65 or 65% and its error in the order of 8.39%.en
dc.description.sponsorshipAsociacion Chilena de Control Automatico ACCA;et al.;Macrofacutad de Chile;Universidad de La Frontera de Chile;Universidad de Talca;Universidad del Bio-Bio Chile
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.en_PE
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_PE
dc.relation.isPartOfCHILEAN Conference on Electrical, Electronics Engineering, Information and Communication Technologies, CHILECON 2017
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessen_PE
dc.sourceRepositorio Institucional - UCHen_PE
dc.sourceUniversidad de Ciencias y Humanidadesen_PE
dc.subjectApplication programsen
dc.subjectEducation computingen
dc.subjectEngineering educationen
dc.subjectCapstone projectsen
dc.subjectEducation qualityen
dc.subjectEfficienceen
dc.subjectEngineering programen
dc.subjectError of the modelsen
dc.subjectIndividual scoresen
dc.subjectQuality of educationen
dc.subjectResearch programsen
dc.subjectStudentsen
dc.titleMathematical methodologies for the measurement of the quality of education in engineering programs in Peruen_PE
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjecten_PE
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/CHILECON.2017.8229645en_PE
dc.identifier.journalCHILEAN Conference on Electrical, Electronics Engineering, Information and Communication Technologies, ChileConen_PE
Aparece en las colecciones: Conference Paper

Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.